Chapter 1 of Sex, Time
and Power
An excerpt...
Unknown Mother/African
Eve
Sex endows the individual with a dumb
and powerful instinct, which carries his body and soul toward another;
makes it one of the dearest employments of his life to select and
pursue a companion, and joins to possession the keenest pleasure,
to rivalry the fiercest rage, and to solitude an eternal melancholy.
What more could be needed to suffuse the world with the deepest
meaning and beauty? —George Santayana
The reconstruction of evolutionary history is better
regarded as a game than as a science, evolutionary hypotheses should
be stated with varying degrees of confidence always keeping in mind
that certainty cannot be achieved.
—Sherwood Washburn
She died an agonizingly slow and painful death.
She was not accorded funerary rites, nor was her corpse laid to
rest in a grave. Her remains constitute but a sliver of debris—a
disconnected tooth here, a chip of a fossilized bone there, fragments
lost in the strata of bygone ages. At the time of her death, she
represented the latest in a line of primates called “hominids”
that had begun their evolutionary trial run several million years
earlier. If paleontologists ever find her final resting place, we
should erect a memorial on the spot in recognition that she did
not die in vain. An appropriate name for her marker would be “The
Tomb of the Unknown Mother.” Her passing heralded the birth
throes of a new species.
Imagine that a group of intergalactic anthropologists
had been observing these primates from the beginning. When Unknown
Mother died, the visitors would have exchanged knowing looks, because
they could plainly see that her fate was foredoomed. The hominid
line from which she arose had split away from other primates by
developing two adaptations destined to collide. Hominids were the
only primates to depend on a new means of moving about that required
only two limbs instead of four. An upright stance allowed them to
clamber down from the trees and seek a living first on the forest
floor and later on the open savanna. Because their erect posture
greatly increased the possibility that the first creature to stride
would end up as “cat food,” they needed a crucial second
adaptation. Since they could not outrun or outfight predators, they
required an enlarged brain capable of outwitting those creatures
intent on devouring them.
During the last two and half million years, the
hominid brain had tripled in size but the opening in the pelvic
girdle through which this rapidly enlarging brain had to pass at
birth did not keep pace. These two adaptations—two-leggedness
and watermelon-sized heads—were clearly incompatible.
The new engineering imperatives of standing upright
had sculpted the hominid’s pelvic ring of bone into a new
shape, flattening it from front to back. The bipedal pelvis, anatomically
dissimilar to its counterpart in four-legged animals, also acquired
a novel architectural function. It had to serve as a basin to contain
the mass of intestines pressing down from above and prevent them
from falling down and out through the rectum. Consequently, the
bony hole in the pelvis had to remain relatively small. Only the
wide, comparatively horizontal flanges of the human iliac pelvic
bones, the narrowness of the pelvic inlet, and the thin sheet of
muscles suspending the anus prevented this unusual primate from
having the discomfiting experience of being turned inside out while
out for a stroll after a particularly heavy lunch—a gravitational
hazard that does not pose a problem for any other animal.*
These functional constraints prevented the channel
in the female’s pelvis from enlarging sufficiently to accommodate
easily the continually growing size of her fetus’s brain during
childbirth. Mother Nature devised numerous ingenious sleights of
hand to thread the baby through the “eye” of a mother’s
birth canal.† Despite these clever adaptations, hominid females
began to experience increasingly difficult deliveries. The problem
became especially acute around 150,000 years ago, at which point
the hominid brain had completed a remarkably short burst of rapid
inflation that had added one-third to its size. A disaster was in
the making.
Eventually, somewhere, sometime, a healthy young
hominid had growing within her a new life whose head was simply
too large to negotiate the confining walls of her birth canal. During
the delivery, her baby became wedged. After a prolonged labor, she
died. Her baby died. Those in attendance could do nothing to help.
The laws of physics superseded the strength of her uterine contractions.
Unfortunately, she was the first of an avalanche of young mothers
to die. For the first time in the history of any higher animal,
extraordinarily high numbers of healthy females began to die in
childbirth; the percentage of stillbirths rose with the number of
maternal deaths.
The number of live progeny per mother at the outset
of our species was low, because prolonged childhoods forced ancestral
women to space their pregnancies far apart. Moreover, one child
per pregnancy was the general rule. Young children who lost their
mother during a subsequent delivery experienced a catastrophe. Their
prospects of surviving without her were bleak. Even a small percentage
of mothers dying in childbirth in each generation, especially when
combined with factors like disease, drought, or predators, could
have placed great stress on a local population.
In a supreme paradox, the leading cause of death
for females of the human species became birth. A cursory examination
of dates on old gravestones in any cemetery prior to the twentieth
century confirms the high mortality routinely associated with childbirth,
a condition that does not exist for any other mammal. No female
of any other species has as much difficulty bearing her young as
a human. And no female of any other species routinely solicits and
requires help from others to deliver her baby.*
The death of the Unknown Mother signaled the onset
of an evolutionary crisis. The loss of a significant number of mothers
and their newborns in childbirth was a wasteful reproductive strategy
that could have been expected to toll the death knell of the line.
Yet it created precisely the kind of crucible in which a species
must adapt—or die.
Scientists working in the field of evolutionary
biology hypothesize a mechanism to explain how a new species often
seems to appear all at once in the fossil record. Imagine an isolated
local population of an existing species living in harmony with its
ecosystem. Suddenly, some new, harmful environmental factor impinges
upon the system; large numbers of the local population begin to
die. At the eleventh hour, a beneficial random mutation (or mutations)
that had previously occurred in the genes of one individual increases
its owner’s chances of surviving to the next generation.*
The offspring of this fortunate individual inherit the gene (or
genes) and it quickly spreads. Within the span of several generations,
the hard-pressed local population that was on the verge of extinction
surges back by evolving an innovative suite of internal metabolic
adjustments, physical changes, or modified behavioral responses
that allows it to adapt to its new circumstances.
The animal to emerge sometimes differs so significantly
from its predecessor that it can be categorized as an entirely new
species. Scientists refer to this large dying off of the many so
that the few (or even one) can evolve as “passing through
a bottleneck.” When there is a sudden discontinuity between
a precursor species and a new one, some scientists propose that
this evolutionary process is due to what they call “punctuated
equilibrium.”
Many conditions can precipitate bottlenecks. Geologic
catastrophes, major volcanic eruptions, abrupt climatic changes
(such as the sudden onset of ice ages), pluvials (periods of rains
of Biblical proportions), and prolonged droughts can all position
a species in the crosshairs of extinction. Epidemics of viruses,
bacteria, or parasites can decimate food sources or attack the local
population directly.
Approximately 150,000 years ago, in a small region
of East Africa, around present-day Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania,
the current countries bordering Lake Victoria, one such bottleneck
occurred. A local population of Homo erectus, a tool-making hominid,
had been living there successfully for over a million years.†
Then some yet-to-be-identified event occurred that affected the
survival of this particular group of hominids. From this stressed
band, a single female known as Mitochondrial African Eve succeeded
where Unknown Mother had failed, giving birth to the new species
originally classified as Homo sapiens sapiens,* the doubly wise
human.
Though the exact birthdate of our species remains
uncertain, the scenario that a single woman birthed the modern human
species is on firmer scientific grounds thanks to the reliability
of the new science of molecular biology. Laboratory tests performed
on mitochondrial DNA can accurately measure the genetic variation
that exists between members of a species and the differences existing
among species. Scientists can then construct “molecular clocks”
and calculate how long ago a particular species split away from
its precursor. Molecular biology has proved to be the great Rosetta
Stone of evolutionary changes. The existence of an African Eve is
extremely likely, because the genetic material of all humans alive
today is eerily similar.
The genes of chimpanzee communities inhabiting
ranges only a few thousand yards apart have more genetic diversity
than those of humans separated by oceans. Despite the dramatic differences
in the skin pigmentation, eye color, body shapes, and hair types
of people from disparate regions of the world, all humans are genetically
homogeneous to an extraordinary degree. In fact, there is less than
0.1 percent difference between the gene structure of any one human
and another. This suggests that each of us is a not-so-distant descendant
of one fairly recent ancestral female. Since we have not had time
to diverge very far genetically, our species’ birthdate can
be calculated backward in tens of thousands of years, instead of
millions.
Some dire factor, condition, or event adversely
affected the species that lived in the area around present-day Lake
Victoria, leading to a population bottleneck. Let us call it Factor
X. But what was X? What environmental challenge could have been
the catalyst for the radiation of a new species? The geologic and
archeological record is relatively silent. Variations in the local
climate did occur, but none seems harsh enough to prompt our origin.
Scientists have not identified sudden discontinuities in the area’s
flora or fauna. And yet some extreme condition must have occurred,
for African Eve to burst forth like Athena fully formed from the
brow of Zeus. Though there are many competing scientific theories,
none has managed to gain sufficient support to explain the bottleneck
fully.
I propose that the “bottleneck” through
which our unfortunate immediate ancestors squeezed was actually
a real bottleneck. Scientists scouring the landscape in search of
an external Factor X may have been looking in the wrong place. The
precipitating event that pushed a local population of hominids toward
the edge of extinction was neither a climate change, a geological
force, the arrival of predators or disappearance of prey, nor a
shift in the availability of food resources. It was an internal,
anatomical one.*
The unyielding walls of the birth canal, like the
alignment of Scylla and Charybdis,† produced the bottleneck
that shaped all subsequent hominid evolution. The death of the Unknown
Mother and her unlucky baby, and the subsequent dying off of increasingly
large numbers of hominid mothers and their newborns, was the stressful
Factor X that precipitated the Homo sapiens line.
*The muscles making up the human pelvic floor formerly
served the genial function of wagging animals’ tails. Natural
Selection urgently pressed what was left of them into a new use
in the bipedal hominid. They now served to buttress a potentially
lethal defect. Some intermittently upright animals—for example,
penguins—have evolved similar adaptations to defend against
this problem, but in no other species is the gravitational hazard
as serious as it is in humans.
†The soft bones of a human baby’s skull
resemble tectonic plates. As the infant’s head wends its way
down the mother’s tortuous birth canal, the plates slide and
bend to conform to each twist and turn. To assist this molding process,
the bony circle of the mother’s birth canal relaxes. Under
normal conditions, the iliac, pubic, ischial, and sacral bones are
welded together by dense bridges of cartilage nearly as rigid as
the bones they join. During delivery, however, this tissue undergoes
a remarkable transformation, akin to concrete dissolving into Silly
Putty. As the fetal head progresses, the pelvic circle, in a complementary
maneuver, stretches imperceptibly, its new elasticity conveniently
conforming to the mush-skull pushing through it.
*There have been sightings of dolphins and whales
attempting to assist pregnant females of their kind with deliveries.
In one spectacular example observed in captivity, three different
species of dolphins were involved. A full-term female was in trouble:
Her newborn’s dorsal fin was caught in her pelvis. The second
dolphin pulled out the baby and assisted the mother to raise it
to the surface. While this was happening, the third female delivered
the afterbirth, using her teeth. A few land mammals, such as rodents
and primates, may also offer limited assistance to a female in labor.
Despite these isolated reports, what is clear from observations
of many animal births is that no other species’ full-term
females routinely signal their need for birth assistance. Contrary
to popular myths, indigenous women do not simply go into the field
and bear their babies alone. In a cross-cultural study of 296 peoples,
only 24 reported that a woman on occasion has her baby without assistance.
In none of the cultures studied was an unassisted first birth a
routine event.
*A single gene’s sequence of DNA contains
the instructions for how to build a protein, which in turn can become
an enzyme that further directs the building of an organism. Since
there are many variations on the 3-D configuration of proteins and
the timing of their entry into the building schedule, a single gene
can have an enormous impact on the final form, metabolism, and responses
of an organism.
†To avoid a clutter of scientific terms,
I will gloss over the subtle distinctions between the fossils referred
to as Homo heidelbergensis, Homo ergaster, archaic Homo sapiens,
and many other recent paleontological finds. Each new detail gleaned
from studying these ancient bones adds incrementally to our understanding
of the evolution of our species, but, unfortunately, to do the subject
justice would, I believe, distract from my narrative. Also, a species
can evolve in response to a positive development in its environment.
A new untapped food source, for example, can prod a species into
evolving novel adaptations to take advantage of the bounty. I conjecture
that the dominant influence affecting our species was a negative
one rather than a positive one, however.
*This term is now outmoded. With the recent identification
of Neanderthal DNA, it is no longer necessary to call us Homo sapiens
sapiens, except for occasional emphasis. For the rest of this book,
I will use the current classification of our species, Homo sapiens.
*This is the “obstetrical dilemma”
first described by Sherwood Washburn in 1960 and elaborated by others,
particularly Wenda Trevathan and Karen Rosenberg. The major focus
in the literature has been on the effect of difficult labor on child
development. The narrowness of the human female pelvis caused infants
to be born alitricial—that is, extremely immature. According
to estimates based on the size of other primate infants, the length
of a human pregnancy should be eighteen months instead of nine.
Bringing infants into the world long “before their time”
created unique survival problems.
Helpless babies imposed immense child-rearing responsibilities
on mothers, forcing a drastic division of labor between the human
sexes. And it required women to enjoin men to assist them in raising
their offspring, since failure in this endeavor would have fatal
consequences for the entire species. It also created novel opportunities
for children to have a longer period, called childhood, in which
to learn. Much has been written about the consequences of the prolonged
human childhood. I wish to redirect the focus away from immature
infants to what I consider to be a relatively neglected aspect of
the human species’ obstetrical dilemma—namely, maternal
mortality.
†From a Greek myth, Scylla and Charybdis
were two dangerous obstacles between which Odysseus’ ship
had to navigate during the odyssey.
|
back to top